To define legend, we appeal to the dictionaries. BLACKSMITH (2001, P. 453) affirms that the legend is part of the popular tradition, being ' ' narration of wonderful character, where the historical facts are deformed by the imagination of the people or poet, (…) fiction, fbula' ' , and LUFT (2001, p.420) complements with ' ' fabulosa history or liar, (…) mentira' '. We can affirm, therefore, that some characteristics of the myth and the legend if confuse, being both narratives. The first search explanation for that the man did not find, at the time of its sprouting, concepts that brought agreement; to understand second, we search Joo Alfredo de Freitas (apud Cascudo, 1965, PP 52-53), that he attributes to the little scientific knowledge of the people the distortion of facts, the great influence of the superstitions and, is concluded, to the sprouting of legends. Erectile downtownsault.org buy cialis dysfunction can be am incredibly experience for any man. From the end, there can be a precise lesion within viagra without prescription the target location that can be easily monitored from the brain that will allow flush of blood to your sex organ or holds the blood there which benefits into hard or sturdy erection. This medicine viagra discount india takes around 45 minutes in producing desired results. Practice the blue pills under the cheap viagra prices absolute supervision of the doctor. They, perhaps, do not look the explanation of the sprouting of something, but they try to count what visa was heard or, being influenced for the fantasiosa mind or the fear.
Under this aspect, we can affirm that the historical context is factor of influence not only in the appearance of myths and legends, but in its maintenance: the fantasiosa mind is pledged in informing what it heard of others, in attractive way, and the details they need to arrest the attention of the reading listener//interlocutor: the grotesco appears in the narratives. Lewis affirms, in its workmanship a critical experiment in the literary one (2005), that, when we speak of myths (…) we are generally thinking about the best species and forgetting us the majority. If we will be behind all the myths of a people, probably we will be horrified with what we will go to read. Most of them, what it wants that they have meant for old or the wild ones, are, for we, meaningless and chocking; chocking not only for its cruelty and obscenity, but for its apparent dullness (…).